Is there a geneticist in the house?
Oct. 20th, 2004 10:59 pmFrom yesterday's Hansard, courtesy of a particularly loopy (and I say this without prejudice, or at least any need for it, against his party) MP:
Any suggestion that people's genes are fixed in one particular way from the moment of conception is wrong. The expression ''bisexual''—I am never quite sure what it means—is now a commonplace in the language. It suggests that people can change their sexual proclivities at different stages of their life. That is a fact of life.
*boggle*
I think I'd support his "[not] sure what it means" wholeheartedly. As for the rest...
Any suggestion that people's genes are fixed in one particular way from the moment of conception is wrong. The expression ''bisexual''—I am never quite sure what it means—is now a commonplace in the language. It suggests that people can change their sexual proclivities at different stages of their life. That is a fact of life.
*boggle*
I think I'd support his "[not] sure what it means" wholeheartedly. As for the rest...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-25 12:23 am (UTC)Put even further in context, what he actually meant was
I will do everything in my power to obstruct this bill, and would happily read out the OED from now until the Queen's Speech if I were allowed to do so
Some of the epithets applied in the course of subsequent debate even by other members of his own party have been fairly entertaining!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-25 12:45 am (UTC)